[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
Reported by Jocelyn Legault | October 16th, 2009 @ 04:13 AM | in v2.0.0
When debugging, it's often useful to know what function is currently executing, especially when dealing with real time or UI issues that can't be interrupted by a break in the debugger.
The new function guard would write automatically to the debug console what function it enters and leave, and would also indent as it goes deeper in the call stack.
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
Jocelyn Legault October 16th, 2009 @ 04:14 AM
- State changed from “new” to “open”
-
Jocelyn Legault October 16th, 2009 @ 04:51 AM
(from [d970d6b283a13757d84dc447bb53993be353deb6]) Debug function guards: implement the guard.
- Implement the guard.
- Implement auxiliary "guard_output" macro that allow for properly indented comments.
- Set of unit tests for the guard and for guard_output
[#8 state:needs-ack]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/joce/npp-community/commit/d970d6b283a13757d84dc44... -
Jocelyn Legault October 16th, 2009 @ 05:01 AM
- State changed from “open” to “needs_ack”
(from [fe52743b74fb7b7c8c1be95d06de1511bdbecdb1]) Debug function guards: implement the guard.
- Implement the guard.
- Implement auxiliary "guard_output" macro that allow for properly indented comments.
- Set of unit tests for the guard and for guard_output
[#8 state:needs_ack]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/joce/npp-community/commit/fe52743b74fb7b7c8c1be95... -
Thell Fowler October 16th, 2009 @ 02:36 PM
- State changed from “needs_ack” to “proposed”
- Tag changed from “debug, tool, _feature” to “debug, reporting, tool, _feature”
That would be helpful, I'll get it put onto pu.
One concern though, without having really played with it yet... Would it make more sense to have it conditional on a different #define than just DEBUG? Like perhaps DEBUG_VERBOSE?
Somewhere in my code I had function guards setup that where only active during runtime if a console was attached. I'll see if I can find that.
Thell
-
Thell Fowler October 16th, 2009 @ 02:54 PM
- Tag changed from “debug, reporting, tool, _feature” to “branch-pu, debug, reporting, tool, _feature”
(from [2cdcfeb20d0debb61d7495e8cd874902e40cfe23]) Merge branch 'jl/debug-guard-tools' into pu
- jl/debug-guard-tools: Debug function guards: implement the guard.
Conflicts:
PowerEditor/visual.net/notepadPlus.8.vcproj PowerEditor/visual.net/notepadPlus.9.vcproj[#8 state:proposed tagged:branch-pu] http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/2cdcfeb20d0deb...
-
Jocelyn Legault October 16th, 2009 @ 04:24 PM
The DEBUG_VERBOSE vs _DEBUG makes sense.
That could be useful to debug problems that would only appear in release or shipping. -
Jocelyn Legault October 16th, 2009 @ 06:17 PM
Instead of DEBUG_VERBOSE, can we say !SHIPPING instead?
Thinking about it, I would hate to have this code bloat the distributed binaries. In any case, so far, the only difference between SHIPPING and NDEBUG (aka Release) is the tests that are compiled out.
-
Jocelyn Legault October 16th, 2009 @ 06:28 PM
Anything I should do about the reported vcproj conflicts?
-
npp-community October 16th, 2009 @ 06:41 PM
How about both !SHIPPING and DEBUG_VERBOSE, solves the shipping binary and still gives finer control of verbose output.
No, you don't need to do anything regarding those two conflicts. They were expected.
-
-
Thell Fowler October 16th, 2009 @ 09:18 PM
- Milestone set to “v1.0.0-rc2”
-
Jocelyn Legault October 17th, 2009 @ 05:41 AM
I'd like to hear how you intend to ues the guards so I can understand the need for
DEBUG_VERBOSEbetter. The way I sawfunc_guard, they where to be added when debugging, and removed before submitting your branch.I thought that was just a tool one would use punctually, like
debugf().If we were to sprinkle them all across the board, N++ would become unusable when they would be enabled. I've just enabled them in DockingCont and DockingManager, and N++ slows to a crawl.
If you want to leave the
func_guard()calls in there, we would need a way to enable / disable per file. -
Thell Fowler October 17th, 2009 @ 05:52 AM
Well, I do feel that having the tool available is a definite good thing, yet also, adding and removing would get quite tedious. Trying to enable/disable on a per file basis seems like it would be quite a job to setup properly given that n++ nor scintilla take advantage of namespace to any extreme.
Using a per function control file might be a way to go. A header with something along the lines of an ifndef #SHIPPING and ifdef #DEBUG_VERBOSE would then process a list of defines (say something like #define GUARD$function_name ) then developers wouldn't need to add remove from the code itself, it could easily be enabled/disabled purposefuly_ and it would still offer fine grained control...
What about that?
-
Jocelyn Legault October 20th, 2009 @ 05:03 AM
- State changed from “proposed” to “needs_ack”
(from [af17927db601f01db8706894794cd36a89cf4215]) Debug function guards: implement the guard.
- Implement the guard.
- Implement auxiliary "guard_output" macro that allow for properly indented comments.
- Set of unit tests for the guard and for guard_output
[#8 state:needs_ack]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/joce/npp-community/commit/af17927db601f01db870689... -
-
Jocelyn Legault October 20th, 2009 @ 08:58 PM
- Milestone cleared.
Changed milestone to none, as this feature won't make it in before 1.0.0 is stamped.
-
Thell Fowler October 21st, 2009 @ 05:19 PM
- State changed from “needs_ack” to “proposed”
- Assigned user changed from “Jocelyn Legault” to “npp-community”
(from [dec005f6c2e4940fd928a8f6fecde3f1441dcde5]) Merge branch 'jl/LH-8/debug-function-guards' into pu
- jl/LH-8/debug-function-guards: Debug function guards: implement the guard.
Conflicts:
PowerEditor/visual.net/notepadPlus.8.vcproj PowerEditor/visual.net/notepadPlus.9.vcproj[#8 state:proposed responsible:npp-community]
Signed-off-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/dec005f6c2e494... -
-
Thell Fowler November 13th, 2009 @ 09:18 PM
(from [de985f2ecc9a0053ee3b9dcff3eb0a65fee9adb8]) Merge branch 'jl/LH-8/debug-function-guards' into pu
- jl/LH-8/debug-function-guards: Debug function guards: implement the guard.
[#8 state:proposed]
Signed-off-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/de985f2ecc9a00... -
Jocelyn Legault November 13th, 2009 @ 10:26 PM
A word of warning:
That feature should not make it in the trunk before 1.0.0 is out of the
door. -
Thell Fowler November 17th, 2009 @ 11:25 PM
(from [97fd698d2300f8cb6f84ff2742a9ce3a0ccdff7f]) Merge branch 'jl/LH-8/debug-function-guards' into pu
- jl/LH-8/debug-function-guards: Debug function guards: implement the guard.
[#8 state:proposed] http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/97fd698d2300f8...
-
Jocelyn Legault November 18th, 2009 @ 06:15 AM
- State changed from “proposed” to “needs_ack”
(from [db88840f9f26db2c14c107938bce71f47958ae6e]) Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category
-
New way to enable / disable function guards per category. Such a category can be either a file name or of a different scope altogether.
-
In non-shipping, the disabled guards still leave a skeleton in place, but the amount of executed code is minimal and should not be noticeable.
-
In shipping, the guards are still removed altogether.
[#8 state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/joce/npp-community/commit/db88840f9f26db2c14c1079... -
Jocelyn Legault November 18th, 2009 @ 11:27 PM
(from [e2986d0b930b52ab4acab6d290831a9c86ca3774]) Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category
-
New way to enable / disable function guards per category. Such a category can be either a file name or of a different scope altogether.
-
In non-shipping, the disabled guards still leave a skeleton in place, but the amount of executed code is minimal and should not be noticeable.
-
In shipping, the guards are still removed altogether.
[#8 state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/joce/npp-community/commit/e2986d0b930b52ab4acab6d... -
-
Thell Fowler November 21st, 2009 @ 06:37 PM
- Tag cleared.
Hello Joce,
First thing I saw when scanning over this is the line lengths. That needs to be fixed since it is totally out of style with other code in the project. Also, would you mind adding an explanation to the commit or comment the code with an explanation of the purpose of the function guards and usage? Lastly, with the new setup what are you thinking would be a typical usage case? Is it the responsibility of the developer to add/remove func guard statements? Is there going to be a default disabled macro and a git ignored file that different developers can use without needing to worry about accidentally committing?
I like the idea of categories, how are you thinking this would be used?
-
Jocelyn Legault November 23rd, 2009 @ 06:21 PM
How many columns do you want?
I personally feel that 80 is way to restrictive in this day and age.
I usually try to limit myself to 132 (while I clearly busted that in a few
place in there).
Would 132 chars be ok with you? -
Thell Fowler November 24th, 2009 @ 04:09 AM
I agree that a strict setting of 80 is kind of crazy in this day and age. I try not to go too far above that myself unless there is a reason, and I have a visual right margin set at 100 so that two pages w/ consolas 8pt can be read without too much vertical scrolling on 1400xXXX screen.
I've found 120-130 works nicely for single page viewing. It's up to you. I just would like to have it at least have a 'similar' coding feel to the rest of the source.
-
Jocelyn Legault November 28th, 2009 @ 12:52 AM
(from [a6fd1a5a639853e360b8c849d752d8115119ae41]) Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category
-
New way to enable / disable function guards per category. Such a category can be either a file name or of a different scope altogether.
-
In non-shipping, the disabled guards still leave a skeleton in place, but the amount of executed code is minimal and should not be noticeable.
-
In shipping, the guards are still removed altogether.
[#8 state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/joce/npp-community/commit/a6fd1a5a639853e360b8c84... -
-
Jocelyn Legault November 28th, 2009 @ 12:52 AM
(from [c3182c46609e8b3bf9e4729194def373bf6807a1]) Debug guards: add documentation
- Documentation added to explain what is the purpose of the function debug guards and their intended use.
[#8 state:needs_ack]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/joce/npp-community/commit/c3182c46609e8b3bf9e4729... -
Thell Fowler November 28th, 2009 @ 11:01 PM
- Assigned user changed from “npp-community” to “Jocelyn Legault”
- State changed from “needs_ack” to “acked”
Acked. Thanks for the write-up, makes quite a bit more sense now.
I think we will need to implement a test that ensures there are no enable/disable statements in committed .cpp files. Not sure how, but it could be made a part of the review process as well as the build process.
It may even make sense to have a folder with committed and tracked pre-defined groups.
ie: function-guards/theme-tracer.h/view-tracer.h /lexer-tracer.hetc...
or better yet, a git-submodule repo with a bunch of predefined tracers, so developers could keep their private func guard settings in the submodule so it is still in the build tree without needing to worry about if they get committed or not.
Alo, what do you think of adding an IsDebuggerPresent() to limit the amount of processing that occures when running a debug or release build without the debugger attached?
Thell
-
npp-community November 29th, 2009 @ 06:35 AM
- State changed from “acked” to “needs_ack”
(from [96b32e88fc5c521c092c0712b336c3fbad2db697]) Debug function guards: implement the guard.
- Implement the guard.
- Implement auxiliary "guard_output" macro that allow for properly indented comments.
- Set of unit tests for the guard and for guard_output
[#8 state:needs_ack]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/96b32e88fc5c52... -
npp-community November 29th, 2009 @ 06:35 AM
- Assigned user changed from “Jocelyn Legault” to “npp-community”
(from [2d475c0e1ba981a789603704d87032ba15b9f55f]) Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category
-
New way to enable / disable function guards per category. Such a category can be either a file name or of a different scope altogether.
-
In non-shipping, the disabled guards still leave a skeleton in place, but the amount of executed code is minimal and should not be noticeable.
-
In shipping, the guards are still removed altogether.
[#8 state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/2d475c0e1ba981... -
npp-community November 29th, 2009 @ 06:36 AM
(from [1085f7e970ef25800b75f9d1c07356a6af53eded]) Debug guards: add documentation
- Documentation added to explain what is the purpose of the function debug guards and their intended use.
[#8 state:needs_ack]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/1085f7e970ef25... -
Thell Fowler November 29th, 2009 @ 06:36 AM
- State changed from “needs_ack” to “proposed”
(from [4b29d77e2a871344ba4d8787ce466bd18ec21b3a]) Merge branch 'jl/LH-8v3/debug-guards-enabling-per-file' into pu
- jl/LH-8v3/debug-guards-enabling-per-file: Debug guards: add documentation Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category Debug function guards: implement the guard.
Conflicts:
PowerEditor/src/precompiled_headers.h[#8 state:proposed]
Acked-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/4b29d77e2a8713... -
Thell Fowler November 29th, 2009 @ 04:50 PM
Line 134 of MISC/Common/Common.h is changed from DEBUG to _DEBUG, which means that instead of the developer controlling when to activate the NO_DEFAULT_CASE it is done simply by using the Debug configuration.
Perhaps this is a good target for an initial usage of the function guard group/category capability.
-
Jocelyn Legault December 3rd, 2009 @ 12:14 AM
I think we will need to implement a test that ensures there are no enable/disable statements in committed .cpp files. Not sure how, but it could be made a part of the review process as well as the build process.
I don't agree. The enable / disable calls need to be there if we want the guards to stay in the code. You'll get compilation error otherwise.
Also, as I mention in the comments / documentation, the suggested current use is basically one category per cpp file. e.g. in
foo.cpp, you'd have categoryfooand inother.cpp, you'd have categoryother.Maybe I need to clarify this in the documentation.
Alo, what do you think of adding an IsDebuggerPresent() to limit the amount of processing that occures when running a debug or release build without the debugger attached?
There's very little that goes on other then outputting to the debug console. And if no debug process is attached, OutputDebugString already does nothing by itself. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363362(VS.85).aspx
-
Jocelyn Legault December 3rd, 2009 @ 05:27 AM
- State changed from “proposed” to “needs_ack”
(from [e7f66a94384925e3cb68364f04cdb45cc7698adf]) Debug output: improve output performance and design
- Replace the
outputFfunction with theDebugOutputobject that allows to bundle up the outputs and flush them to the debug console only when ready. - It also improves the testability of debug tools that need to output as you now only have to overload the output part of the class.
DebugOutputcomes with its set of tests.-
The existing function guards tests have been updated to reflect the new output method.
-
Future improvements:
- Instead of an extern variable to the global
DebugOutput(yuk) we could implement a DebugOutput stack where we could push and popDebugOutputobjects. This stack would live in the application object.
- Instead of an extern variable to the global
[#8 state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/joce/npp-community/commit/e7f66a94384925e3cb68364... -
Thell Fowler December 4th, 2009 @ 06:55 PM
I think we will need to implement a test that ensures there are no enable/disable statements in committed .cpp files. Not sure how, but it could be made a part of the review process as well as the build process.
I don't agree. The enable / disable calls need to be there if we want the guards to stay in the code. You'll get compilation error otherwise.
Also, as I mention in the comments / documentation, the suggested current use is basically one category per cpp file. e.g. in foo.cpp, you'd have category foo and in other.cpp, you'd have category other.
Maybe I need to clarify this in the documentation.
The func_guard() statement needs to be there, but why would you exprect the enable/disable statement to be in committed files? A single define in the npp_debug.h to check if there are active func_guards being read in from a non-tracked header seems to be a solution that eliminates having people stepping on each-others toes with enable statements.
Also, what do you think of adding an IsDebuggerPresent() to limit the amount of processing that occures when running a debug or release build without the debugger attached?
There's very little that goes on other then outputting to the debug console. And if no debug process is attached, OutputDebugString already does nothing by itself. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363362(VS.85).aspx .
Good to know!
- npp_debug.h line# 150 should read ...'the function guards' instead of 'debug guards'
-
Jocelyn Legault December 4th, 2009 @ 07:05 PM
Line 134 of MISC/Common/Common.h is changed from DEBUG to _DEBUG, which means that instead of the developer controlling > when to activate the NO_DEFAULT_CASE it is done simply by using the Debug configuration.
Actually, it's not a problem with with the
_DEBUGmacro being used (which is the right one to use). It's a problem with many default cases not being handled. This probably will end up being the proper behaviour, but we still need to investigate to make sure none of these issues are serious.The
_DEBUGmacro will be replaced with theDEBUGone for the time being, but as per our IRC conversation, a new ticket should be created to deal with the NO_DEFAULT_CASES being triggered. -
Jocelyn Legault December 4th, 2009 @ 07:33 PM
The func_guard() statement needs to be there, but why would you exprect the enable/disable statement to be in committed files? A single define in the npp_debug.h to check if there are active func_guards being read in from a non-tracked header seems to be a solution that eliminates having people stepping on each-others toes with enable statements.
That could be useful in some cases, but in many other, having a centralized category file will be rather cumbersome, and will cause full recompilations when adding / removing categories.
Also, for generic calls that can be done in more than one context, it makes much more sense IMO to have the enabling done at file level. Otherwise, you'd still have to have a context for that one file, but it would be declared in a foreign place. i.e.
TinyXML. It is its own context. I don't see why the enabling ofTinyXMLguards should be done elsewhere than that, and disrupting the compilation of other files that have nothing to do with it.Secondly, that would mean that we have a file that knows about all the project, from the top, but that could be included by the bottom. Allow me to explain: Even though we currently don't have any formal code hierarchy, we can agree that utility files like
common.cppare at the bottom of the pile and should not know anything about files implementing higher level concept, as theDocking*.cppfiles for example. With the centralized concept you propose, common.cpp you be exposed, however indirectly, to docking concepts (theDockingcategory) that mean nothing to it.So, while I'm not totally opposed to categories that have scopes broader that files, I think that should be layered, and we should be careful what we put and include where.
-
Thell Fowler December 4th, 2009 @ 07:39 PM
From irc::
[13:36:27] while the explanation is clear enough, I still do not like the idea of the enable/disable being a tracked file.
[13:37:10] enable/disable should never get committed to an enabled state
[13:37:18] that is true
[13:37:46] by having the enabler in the tracked file more checks are required by the developer and the maintainer to ensure they don't make it into committed code
[13:38:00] That is not ideal IMO
[13:39:03] all right, let me ponder on that a bit while I fix some emergency here.
[13:39:05] bbl.
[13:39:09] kk -
Jocelyn Legault December 5th, 2009 @ 08:27 PM
- Milestone set to “v2.0.0”
-
npp-community December 7th, 2009 @ 06:14 AM
(from [affc8250136273c35ae66e3b533d597fdda99295]) Debug function guards: implement the guard.
- Implement the guard.
- Implement auxiliary "guard_output" macro that allow for properly indented comments.
- Set of unit tests for the guard and for guard_output
[#8 state:needs_ack]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/affc8250136273... -
npp-community December 7th, 2009 @ 06:14 AM
(from [9b0cc77d6746b33fdd95cef417b810722e386e26]) Debug guards: add documentation
- Documentation added to explain what is the purpose of the function debug guards and their intended use.
[#8 state:needs_ack]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/9b0cc77d6746b3... -
npp-community December 7th, 2009 @ 06:14 AM
(from [fc77c066e74f3ce3c048d47d9a9d5b38bd59fbd7]) Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category
-
New way to enable / disable function guards per category. Such a category can be either a file name or of a different scope altogether.
-
In non-shipping, the disabled guards still leave a skeleton in place, but the amount of executed code is minimal and should not be noticeable.
-
In shipping, the guards are still removed altogether.
[#8 state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/fc77c066e74f3c... -
-
npp-community December 7th, 2009 @ 06:14 AM
(from [bcb2c98d3c5464030d27ef083475eacc0adaed88]) Debug output: improve output performance and design
- Replace the
outputFfunction with theDebugOutputobject that allows to bundle up the outputs and flush them to the debug console only when ready. - It also improves the testability of debug tools that need to output as you now only have to overload the output part of the class.
DebugOutputcomes with its set of tests.-
The existing function guards tests have been updated to reflect the new output method.
-
Future improvements:
- Instead of an extern variable to the global
DebugOutput(yuk) we could implement a DebugOutput stack where we could push and popDebugOutputobjects. This stack would live in the application object.
- Instead of an extern variable to the global
[#8 state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Legault jocelynlegault@gmail.com
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/bcb2c98d3c5464... - Replace the
-
Thell Fowler December 7th, 2009 @ 06:14 AM
- State changed from “needs_ack” to “proposed”
(from [b43bd63b212af40adf7dfe4418d4427aa535e285]) Merge branch 'jl/LH-8v3/debug-guards-enabling-per-file' into pu
- jl/LH-8v3/debug-guards-enabling-per-file: Debug output: improve output performance and design Debug guards: add documentation Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category Debug function guards: implement the guard.
Conflicts:
PowerEditor/src/MISC/Common/Common.h PowerEditor/src/precompiled_headers.h[#8 state:proposed]
Acked-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/b43bd63b212af4... -
Thell Fowler December 7th, 2009 @ 11:12 PM
(from [f395906707f5ff83e716fe4c99ee29ee7ea74924]) Merge branch 'jl/LH-8v3/debug-guards-enabling-per-file' into pu
- jl/LH-8v3/debug-guards-enabling-per-file: Debug output: improve output performance and design Debug guards: add documentation Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category Debug function guards: implement the guard.
Conflicts:
PowerEditor/src/MISC/Common/Common.h PowerEditor/src/precompiled_headers.h[#8 state:proposed]
Acked-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/f395906707f5ff... -
Thell Fowler December 17th, 2009 @ 04:17 PM
(from [ed2008df1df33674c7ff537d192e2f8e326a557d]) common.h: split generic tchar defines from common functions
- Prep for function guard category inclusion. npp_debug.h requires the generics, and some common functions require npp_debug.h.
[#8]
Signed-off-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/almostautomated/npp-community/commit/ed2008df1df3... -
Thell Fowler December 22nd, 2009 @ 03:53 PM
(from [5f86353deafc23cb9f56ceb22a61849716d22907]) common.h: split generic tchar defines from common functions
- Prep for function guard category inclusion. npp_debug.h requires the generics, and some common functions require npp_debug.h.
[#8]
Signed-off-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/almostautomated/npp-community/commit/5f86353deafc... -
Thell Fowler December 22nd, 2009 @ 03:53 PM
(from [1f9f01b1bc97b9878f1f8dd23ed7f6b09d6d679a]) Merge branch 'jl/LH-8v3/debug-guards-enabling-per-file' into pu
- jl/LH-8v3/debug-guards-enabling-per-file: Debug output: improve output performance and design Debug guards: add documentation Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category Debug function guards: implement the guard.
Conflicts:
PowerEditor/src/MISC/Common/Common.h PowerEditor/src/precompiled_headers.h[#8]
Signed-off-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/almostautomated/npp-community/commit/1f9f01b1bc97... -
Jocelyn Legault January 7th, 2010 @ 07:32 PM
You forgot to add
http://github.com/almostautomated/npp-community/tree/5f86353deafc23cb9f56ceb22a61849716d22907/PowerEditor/src/MISC/Common/CommonGenerics.hCommonGenerics.h
to notepadPlus.8.vcproj -
-
Thell Fowler January 19th, 2010 @ 12:02 AM
(from [a75302c78043bc9a22f9e3a8586a952290bfcd3f]) Merge branch 'jl/LH-8v4/introduce-debug-guards' into next
-
jl/LH-8v4/introduce-debug-guards: common.h: split generic tchar defines from common functions testNppDebug.cpp: add tests for guard debug statements npp_debug.h: add guard_debugf_cat() controlled by guard state gitignore: do not ignore PowerEditor/MISC/Debug Debug output: improve output performance and design Debug guards: add documentation Debug guards: add a way to enable / disable per category Debug function guards: implement the guard.
-
Merge note: When merging a few manual changes are needed to ensure that common generic and DEFAULT_NO_CASE are properly handled.
Conflicts:
PowerEditor/src/MISC/Common/Common.h PowerEditor/src/precompiled_headers.h PowerEditor/visual.net/notepadPlus.9.vcproj[#8]
Signed-off-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/a75302c78043bc... -
-
Thell Fowler January 19th, 2010 @ 12:10 AM
- State changed from “proposed” to “candidate”
-
Thell Fowler January 27th, 2010 @ 07:54 PM
I've added a fix for the .gitignore from this branch in regards to PowerEditor/src/MISC/Debug being ignored.
1) reverts commit ca84a05d75c10a37863a8983ebfbe4d6dc9cc734
2) Correctly adds the pattern to not ignore to the main .gitignore file and removes the .gitignore from the ...MISC/Debug .gitignore which should be there until such time as there are files there to actually ignore.The commits can be viewed at:
http://github.com/almostautomated/npp-community/commits/jl/LH-8v5/i...
-
Thell Fowler January 29th, 2010 @ 07:17 PM
- State changed from “candidate” to “needs_ack”
-
Jocelyn Legault February 9th, 2010 @ 04:58 AM
- State changed from “needs_ack” to “acked”
It's all good.
I just realized that I forgot to remove a comment when I reimplemented the output streams. Line 112:// JOCE Only one call to OutputF.If you could nix it, that'd be awesome.
-
Thell Fowler February 14th, 2010 @ 04:34 PM
(from [b0534c08a38171c84f6c20bbaa403af11c8f3ef4]) npp_debug.cpp: [trivial] remove stale comment
- OutputF is not in use here anymore, instead g_debugOutput is.
[#8]
Signed-off-by: Thell Fowler git@tbfowler.name
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-community/commit/b0534c08a38171... -
Thell Fowler February 14th, 2010 @ 04:36 PM
- State changed from “acked” to “resolved”
Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.
With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.
Create new ticket
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile »
Notepad++ Community Release
People watching this ticket
Jocelyn Legault
npp-community
Referenced by
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:proposed]
-
18
[Feature] Add Windows Explorer context menu to file tabs
See comment for ticket #8 regarding DEBUG vs _DEBUG
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
-
20
[Bug] NO_DEFAULT_CASE doesn't display useful info.
Prior to going onto next for 2.0 this will need to be mod...
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:proposed]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:proposed]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs-ack]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:proposed tagged:branch-pu]
http://github.com/n...
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack]
-
1
[Bug] N++ hangs on Find in Files
From just a cursory glance it looks like debug function-g...
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:proposed responsible:npp-community]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8]
-
32
Introduce FuncGuard category setup
#8
introduced FuncGuards, yet there is quite a bit of rep...
-
32
Introduce FuncGuard category setup
In the thread for #8 Joce had brought up some very valid ...
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:proposed]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:proposed]
http://github.com/npp-community/npp-...
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8
state:needs_ack responsible:npp-community]
-
8
[Feature] Add new function guard to track entering leaving function in debug output.
[#8]